🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to employ a revised congressional district plan that may create several five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's block that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing significant confusion and upsetting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its ruling.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to employ the districts drawn after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

With a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, noting that its decision was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

This decision is part of a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Usually, boundary revision takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that might create a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, for their part, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation favorable to Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic officials criticized the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic leader stated the court had another time eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.